Medium scale organic fertilizer plant · 4–10 t/h
This is the band most commercial fertilizer projects fall into: enough output to supply a regional dealer network, enough feedstock to justify a dedic
| Section | Typical equipment | Engineering note |
|---|---|---|
| Receiving & mixing | Concrete reception bay, loader, mixer, amendment dosing by volume | Keep it under cover; a wet winter reception bay is where small plants lose their moisture balance |
| Fermentation | Covered windrow with a self-propelled turner, or a shallow groove with a small turner | Three lanes of 8–12 m are usually enough; do not under-size the aisle for loader access |
| Grinding & screening | Semi-wet material crusher plus rotary screener | One crusher and one screener can serve both powder and, later, a granulation section |
| Blending | Horizontal or drum mixer with volumetric or small batching scale | Formulation flexibility is the main commercial advantage of a small plant |
| Bagging | Single or double bucket packing scale, 10–50 kg, manual stitching or sealing | Semi-automatic bagging is normally the right choice at this scale |
| Storage | Covered product store for 2–4 weeks of output | Product moisture regain in an open store is the most common quality complaint |
For 1–3 t/h the fermentation area usually dominates: three windrow lanes of 10 m × 25 m with turning aisles occupy 1,000–1,500 m² on their own. The processing building can be compact — 18 m × 30 m is a comfortable envelope for crushing, screening, mixing and bagging with room for a future granulator — and the product store another 300–500 m².
Utilities are modest: 60–200 kW connected load, water for moisture correction and dust suppression, and, if the plant later adds drying, a fuel supply. The item to get right from day one is drainage. Small plants are frequently built on a flat slab with no falls, and then spend every rainy season with leachate standing where the loader has to work.
A small plant cannot justify a laboratory, but it can control the four variables that decide whether customers come back: moisture of bagged product (oven or moisture meter, one measurement per batch), temperature in the pile (probe, three depths, three times a week), screening (visual check on the reject stream, weighed once a week), and bag weight (check-weigh five bags per shift). Record them on one sheet per day. Plants that keep this record for two seasons know their process; plants that do not spend that time guessing.
Tell us the feedstock available per day and the bag size you want to sell; we return the configuration, the footprint and the equipment scope.
Around 0.5 t/h of finished powder, which corresponds to roughly 10–15 t/day of fresh manure. Below that, a farm usually composts and sells bulk material rather than operating a bagging plant.
Not at the start. Powder is simpler, cheaper and adequate for many local markets. The argument for granules is transport distance and retail presentation — so plan the space for a granulator, but sell powder first if your market accepts it.
Yes, and mixing them usually improves the process, because green waste supplies carbon and manure supplies nitrogen. The design basis must state the shares, because the moisture and C/N of the mix decide the fermentation regime.
Typically three to five months from design approval, including local civil works. Fabrication of the compact equipment set is usually the shorter part of the programme.
Tell us the feedstock, the daily tonnage and the product you want to sell. The engineering team replies with the plant configuration, the equipment scope and the information we still need before layout drawings start.
Prefer to talk first? WhatsApp +86 182 0399 3035 or email [email protected].
Two or three details are enough to start — the engineering team will come back with the configuration and the missing design basis.